Shareef et al v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Mohammed Shareef and Hafsa Fatima
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Case Number: 1:2023cv01270
Filed: March 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Kendall
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2023 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #7 . Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (lk, )
April 21, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Mcclure, Lauren)
March 20, 2023 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Treacy, Elizabeth)
March 20, 2023 Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Oswald, Craig)
March 16, 2023 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 6/12/2023 at 9:00 a.m. which will proceed in Courtroom 2503. Joint Status Report due by 6/7/2023. Virtual hearing requests must be pre-approved by the Court. If you need to appear virtually, send the attached form to Judge Kendall's courtroom deputy. The courtroom deputy will inform you as to whether your request has been approved. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Virtual Hearing Request Form) (lk, )
March 1, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Hafsa Fatima, Mohammed Shareef by Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure (Mcclure, Lauren)
March 1, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Mcclure, Lauren)
March 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Other Relief filed by Mohammed Shareef; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20395531.(Mcclure, Lauren)
March 1, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (kra, )
March 1, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
March 1, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shareef et al v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mohammed Shareef
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hafsa Fatima
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mcclure
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: Craig Arthur Oswald
Represented By: Elizabeth Inez Treacy
Represented By: AUSA - Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?