Domingues v. Kijakazi
Miguel A. Domingues |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
1:2023cv01448 |
March 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Young B Kim |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government's motion for extension of time #11 is granted. The government is directed to file the administrative record by June 7, 2023. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is now due by August 7, 2023. The government's response and/or cross-motion for summary judgment is due by September 6, 2023. If Plaintiff believes that a reply is necessary, Plaintiff may file a reply brief by September 20, 2023, but one is not required. Mailed notice (ec ) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Unopposed) (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The government is ordered to file its answer by May 8, 2023. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by June 8, 2023. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. The government's response and/or cross-motion for summary judgment is due by July 10, 2023. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. Plaintiff's reply is due by July 24, 2023, but one is not required. Mailed notice (ec) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/15/2023. (kl, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. This case will be sent to the executive committee for reassignment. All pending dates before this Court is stricken. Mailed notice. (mma, ) |
Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Nigel B Cooney as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Cooney, Nigel) |
Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (lm, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Miguel A. Domingues for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Miguel A. Domingues by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Miguel A. Domingues; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Domingues v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Miguel A. Domingues | |
Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Nigel B Cooney |
Represented By: | AUSA - SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.