Stockman v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
| Alexandria Stockman |
| Massage Envy Franchising, LLC |
| 1:2023cv01510 |
| March 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: With regret for the late notice, the Court strikes the telephone conference set for this morning (5/4/2023) in view of the ongoing briefing on Defendant's motion #10 to stay pending arbitration. A hearing on the motion will be set as needed by separate order. Mailed notice (jk)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE by Alexandria Stockmanin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC to stay Pending Arbitration #10 (Mccormick, Seth)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 14
STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Alexandria Stockman (Mccormick, Seth)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendant's motion to stay #10 : Plaintiff must respond on or before 5/1/2023 and Defendant must reply on or before 5/22/2023. Within one week of filing, each side must provide two paper courtesy copies of their respective briefs via U.S. Mail or reliable commercial delivery service. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
|
Filing 12
- Joint Statement Regarding Briefing Schedule On Defendant's Motion To Stay Pending Arbitration - STATEMENT by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC in support of motion to stay #10 - Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Defendant's Motion To Stay Pending Arbitration - (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Justin Cryder, #2 Index of Exhibits to Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #5 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #6 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #7 Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #8 Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #9 Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #10 Exhibit 8 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #11 Exhibit 9 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #12 Exhibit 10 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #13 Exhibit 11 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #14 Exhibit 12 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #15 Exhibit 13 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #16 Exhibit 14 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #17 Exhibit 15 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #18 Exhibit 16 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #19 Exhibit 17 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #20 Exhibit 18 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #21 Exhibit 19 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #22 Exhibit 20 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #23 Exhibit 21 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #24 Exhibit 22 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #25 Exhibit 23 to Declaration of Justin Cryder, #26 Exhibit 24 to Declaration of Justin Cryder)(Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC to stay Pending Arbitration (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Alexandria Stockman by Seth Barrow Mccormick (Mccormick, Seth)
|
|
Filing 8
MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, )
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Agreed Motion for extension of time #6 is granted. Defendant must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint on or before 3/31/2023. Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 5/4/2023 at 9:30 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice (ef, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION by Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC for extension of time - Defendant's Agreed Motion For Extension Of Deadline To Respond To Complaint - (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC by Yan Grinblat (Grinblat, Yan)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC by John F. Verhey (Verhey, John)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Massage Envy Franchising, LLC by Kenneth L. Schmetterer (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2023CH01041) filed by Massage Envy Franchising, LLC Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20429247. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Schmetterer, Kenneth)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stockman v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexandria Stockman | |
| Represented By: | Seth Barrow Mccormick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Massage Envy Franchising, LLC | |
| Represented By: | John F. Verhey |
| Represented By: | Kenneth L. Schmetterer |
| Represented By: | Yan Grinblat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
