Richardson v. City Of Chicago et al
| Jamie Richardson |
| City Of Chicago, Cook County Sheriffs, Cook County Jail DOC, Thomas J. Dart, John Doe, N. Vale, B. Pascascio, C. Bryan and Sgt. Valentin |
| 1:2023cv01564 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 04/05/2023 to the U.S. Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants C. Bryan, B. Pascascio, N. Vale, Sgt. Valentin via email (axk, ) |
| MAILED copy of order #5 to Plaintiff, along with four blank USM-285 (Marshals Service) forms; EMAILED copy of order #5 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail and to the Court's Fiscal Department. (axk, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Jamie Richardson (axk, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $23.37 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint #1 ; (2) add as Defendants N. Vale, B. Pascascio, C. Bryan, and Sgt. Valentin; (3) dismiss all other Defendants; (4) issue summonses for service of the complaint #1 on Defendants Vale, Pascascio, Bryan, and Valentin; and (5) send a copy of this order (electronically, if possible) to: (a) Plaintiff, along with four blank USM-285 (Marshals Service) forms for Defendants; (b) the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's present place of incarceration; and (c) the Court's Fiscal Department. Plaintiff must return a completed USM-285 form for each Defendant; without the form, a Defendant cannot be served. The Court appoints the U.S. Marshal to serve Defendants and denies without prejudice Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 . Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 4/5/2023. Mailed notice. (axk, )
|
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Jamie Richardson for attorney assistance. (aee, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Jamie Richardson for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Jamie Richardson (Exhibits). (Envelope not postmarked) (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
