Doe v. City of Chicago et al
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO and James E Gonzales
Case Number: 1:2023cv01679
Filed: March 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2023 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jane Doe by Grant Alan Bosnich Appearance for Plaintiff (Bosnich, Grant)
April 12, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant City of Chicago by Vincent Michael Rizzo (Rizzo, Vincent)
March 17, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff JANE DOEPlaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(Gallagher, Michael)
March 17, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff JANE DOE by Michael L. Gallagher (Gallagher, Michael)
March 17, 2023 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Michael Gallagher regarding complaint, #1 (Gallagher, Michael)
March 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by JANE DOE; jury demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20450926. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Complaint against City of Chicago, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-DOJ Report, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-City of Chicago Consent Decree, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D-IMR #2-6.18.2020, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E-IMR #3-3.30.2021, #6 Civil Cover Sheet P-Federal Civil Cover Sheet)(Gallagher, Michael)
March 17, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )
March 17, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. City of Chicago et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Represented By: Michael L. Gallagher
Represented By: Grant Alan Bosnich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO
Represented By: Vincent Michael Rizzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?