Hamman v. Boyer et al
| James Stephen Hamman |
| Ardwin Boyer, David Statham, Newman, Boyer & Statham, Ltd. and Newman, Boyer & Statham, Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan |
| 1:2023cv01791 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Martha M Pacold |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Pursuant to the Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal #10 , this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. Civil case terminated. (rao, ) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Hamman, James) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendants' motion for additional time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint #8 is granted. The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 5/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Outline for the Initial Joint Status Report) (rao, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Defer Responsive Pleading Deadline (MIDP) Motion for Additional Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead to the Complaint (Hasier, James) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Ardwin Boyer, Newman, Boyer & Statham, Ltd., Newman, Boyer & Statham, Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan, David Statham by James A. Hasier (Hasier, James) |
Filing 6
ORDER: With apologies to counsel, this court's minute entry dated 3/23/2023 #5 is stricken. James S. Hamman, Jr.'s motion for leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff James Hamman #3 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/24/2023: Mailed notice(daj, )
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to appear pro hac vice #3 and motion for leave to appear as attorney #4 are denied. Plaintiff is advised that he does not need to submit a pro hac vice application or move for leave to appear on his own behalf. If plaintiff needs assistance proceeding pro se, plaintiff should consult the Hibbler Help Desk at 312-702-8825, or at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov and click on the link titled Information for People without Lawyers. (rao, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff James Stephen Hamman for leave to appear as Attorney (Hamman, James) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20465659. (Hamman, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hamman, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James Stephen Hamman; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20465491. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Hamman, James) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
