United States of America v. Jones
| United States of America |
| Cory Jones |
| 1:2023cv01825 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Tax Suit: Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Petitioner United States of America regarding Order to Show Cause and United States Petition to Enforce IRS Summons with Exhibits served on Cory Jones on May 5, 2023 (Kaufman, Joseph) |
Filing 5
ORDER to Show Cause Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/10/2023. Mailed notice. (jlj, )
|
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Government's motion to enforce IRS summons #1 is granted. Defendant Cory Jones is ordered to appear in Judge Jenkins's courtroom 2119 at 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, on June 22, 2023 at 9:30 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with the IRS summons served on August 19, 2022. Counsel for the United States shall file a status report by June 15, 2023 with a summary of any communications with Respondent Jones. Enter show cause order. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Petitioner United States of America by Joseph M Kaufman (Kaufman, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Kaufman, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to enforce IRS summons filed by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Declaration of IRS Agent, #2 Proposed Order to Show Cause)(Kaufman, Joseph) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Joseph M Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Cory Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
