Karim v. Instant Brands Inc.
Plaintiff: Khadija Karim
Defendant: Instant Brands Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv01957
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Khadija Karim as to Instant Brands Inc. on 4/5/2023, answer due 4/26/2023. (Legorreta, Loren)
April 24, 2023 Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The defendant's agreed motion for enlargement of time to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. The defendant's responsive pleading is due by 05/26/2023. Mailed notice (air, )
April 21, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Instant Brands Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Laclair, Jordan)
April 20, 2023 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Instant Brands Inc. by Timothy J. Young (Young, Timothy)
April 20, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Instant Brands Inc. by Jordan William Laclair (Laclair, Jordan)
March 29, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Instant Brands Inc. (lm, )
March 29, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, )
March 29, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, )
March 28, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Khadija Karim by Loren Michael Legorreta (Legorreta, Loren)
March 28, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Khadija Karim by Timothy S. Tomasik (Tomasik, Timothy)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Tomasik, Timothy)
March 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Khadija Karim; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20486550. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Tomasik, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Karim v. Instant Brands Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Khadija Karim
Represented By: Loren Michael Legorreta
Represented By: Timothy S. Tomasik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Instant Brands Inc.
Represented By: Timothy J. Young
Represented By: Jordan William Laclair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?