Fairchild v. Cundiff et al
| Telem Fairchild |
| Inspector Cundiff, P.O. Strazzante #8496, P.O. McDermott #6435, P.O. McGrone #11644 and CITY OF CHICAGO |
| 1:2023cv01972 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: City Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #9 is granted. The time for City Defendants to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended to June 16, 2023. The deadline of 6/12/23 for parties to file a joint initial status report #7 is reset to 6/30/23. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 10
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants P.O. McDermott #6435, CITY OF CHICAGO, P.O. McGrone #11644, P.O. Strazzante #8496 by Jordan F Yurchich (Yurchich, Jordan)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION by Defendants P.O. McDermott #6435, CITY OF CHICAGO, P.O. McGrone #11644, P.O. Strazzante #8496 for extension of time to respond to First Amended Complaint (Cohen, Scott)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants P.O. McDermott #6435, CITY OF CHICAGO, P.O. McGrone #11644, P.O. Strazzante #8496 by Scott A. Cohen (Cohen, Scott)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 6/12/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing 6
FIRST AMENDED complaint by Telem Fairchild against All Defendants (Caporale, Vincenzo)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Telem Fairchild by Vincenzo Bruno Caporale (Caporale, Vincenzo)
|
|
Filing 4
Attorney Lien by Telem Fairchild (Kulis, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Telem Fairchild by Brian M Orozco (Orozco, Brian)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Telem Fairchild by Gregory E. Kulis (Kulis, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Telem Fairchild; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20488098. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kulis, Gregory)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
