Lopez v. Bank of Orrick et al
| Jose Lopez |
| Bank of Orrick and Kendall Bank |
| 1:2023cv02063 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPLY by Bank of Orrick, Kendall Bank to MOTION by Defendants Kendall Bank, Bank of Orrick to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint - Class Action #6 [REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS] (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Jose Lopez to motion to dismiss #6 Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Appendix A)(Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 14, the parties agree to stay discovery during the pendency of the dismissal motion. The briefing schedule remains in place, R. 13. The tracking status hearing of 04/28/2023 is reset to 07/07/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 14 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT by Jose Lopez (Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On the Defendants' motion to dismiss #6 , the Plaintiff's response is due on 05/01/2023. The Defendants' reply is due on 05/15/2023. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a tracking status hearing is set for 04/28/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only. Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 04/20/2023. If the parties agree that discovery should be paused during the pendency of the dismissal motion, then they may skip the discovery section of the report. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Atachment #1 Status Report Requirement) (mw, ). |
| Filing 12 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (aee, ) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bank of Orrick, Kendall Bank by Andrew Joseph Scavotto (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jose Lopez by Matthew J. Goldstein (Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jose Lopez by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jose Lopez by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Bank of Orrick, Kendall Bank in support of motion to dismiss #6 (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendants Kendall Bank, Bank of Orrick to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint - Class Action (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Kendall Bank Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Bank of Orrick Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bank of Orrick, Kendall Bank by Andrew Joseph Scavotto (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Scavotto, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2023CV01940) filed by Bank of Orrick, Kendall Bank Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BILNDC-20499304. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - State Court File)(Scavotto, Andrew) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
