Stewart v. Pyn Group LLC
| Michael Stewart |
| Pyn Group LLC doing business as URBANMATTER |
| 1:2023cv02149 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MAILED copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 5/18/2023 to Registrar, Washington DC (axk, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal #12 , under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the case is dismissed with prejudice. Status hearing of 06/16/2023 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Michael Stewart (Aragona, Renee) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The agreed extension motion to respond to the complaint #8 is granted to 06/07/2023, in light of settlement negotiations. The tracking status hearing of 05/26/2023 is reset to 06/16/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint status report by 06/08/2023. Emailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Michael Stewart by Renee Jennifer Aragona (Aragona, Renee) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Oran D Cart for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 5/18/2023 at 08:30 AM. (Cart, Oran) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Pyn Group LLC for extension of time to file answer and to extend deadline for status report (Cart, Oran) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pyn Group LLC by Oran D Cart (Cart, Oran) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pyn Group LLC by Nicole M Anderson (Anderson, Nicole) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Stewart as to Pyn Group LLC on 4/17/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 05/26/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 05/18/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| Filing 3 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (jj, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Pyn Group LLC (jb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Stewart; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20512623. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of Photograph)(Sanders, Craig) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (emc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stewart v. Pyn Group LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Stewart | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Represented By: | Renee Jennifer Aragona |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pyn Group LLC doing business as URBANMATTER | |
| Represented By: | Oran D Cart |
| Represented By: | Nicole M Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
