Baskaran et al v. Coleman et al
| Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer and Patrick Romano |
| #15359 Shane Coleman, #15 Sean Loughran, #5069 Peter Jonas, #19205 Colin Shiels, #2164 Charles Rhein, #4894 Brayan Jauregui, #16028 Christopher De Canto, #12854 Evan Kilponen, #351 Patricia Zuber, Superintendent David Brown and City Of Chicago |
| 1:2023cv02243 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants David Brown, City Of Chicago by Anton Christopher Brown (Brown, Anton) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants David Brown, City Of Chicago by Allan T. Slagel (Slagel, Allan) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants David Brown, City Of Chicago by Thomas Hudson Cross, IV (Cross, Thomas) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants David Brown, City Of Chicago by Elizabeth Erin Babbitt (Babbitt, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano by Hakeem Malik Muhammad Hakeem Muhammad (Muhammad, Hakeem) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Shane Coleman, Christopher De Canto, Brayan Jauregui, Peter Jonas, Evan Kilponen, Sean Loughran, Charles Rhein, Colin Shiels, Patricia Zuber by Molly Boekeloo (Boekeloo, Molly) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Shane Coleman, Christopher De Canto, Brayan Jauregui, Peter Jonas, Evan Kilponen, Sean Loughran, Charles Rhein, Colin Shiels, Patricia Zuber by Misha Itchhaporia (Itchhaporia, Misha) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Shane Coleman, Christopher De Canto, Brayan Jauregui, Peter Jonas, Evan Kilponen, Sean Loughran, Charles Rhein, Colin Shiels, Patricia Zuber by Whitney Newton Hutchinson (Hutchinson, Whitney) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Shane Coleman, Christopher De Canto, Brayan Jauregui, Peter Jonas, Evan Kilponen, Sean Loughran, Charles Rhein, Colin Shiels, Patricia Zuber by Steven Blair Borkan (Borkan, Steven) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Shane Coleman, Christopher De Canto, Brayan Jauregui, Peter Jonas, Evan Kilponen, Sean Loughran, Charles Rhein, Colin Shiels, Patricia Zuber by Timothy P Scahill (Scahill, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano by Brad Thomson (Thomson, Brad) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano by Janine L. Hoft (Hoft, Janine) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano by Nora P. Snyder (Snyder, Nora) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano by Vanessa Del Valle (Del Valle, Vanessa) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano by Ben H. Elson (Elson, Ben) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, ) |
Filing 1
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: 20 CV 6851, Protesters in Support of Black Lives et al v. City of Chicago et al, is currently assigned to the Hon. Sharon Johnson Coleman and referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert; and Pursuant to Judge Coleman's order dated April 6, 2023, the following list of cases are to be severed; therefore It is hereby ordered that the following list of cases are to be randomly reassigned to district judges of this Court; and Severed Cases to be Randomly Reassigned 1. Wilger v. Aviles, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 2. Fouche, Underwood v. Grossklas, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 3. Bartz v. Mudd, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 4. Mallow v. Morrin, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 5. Bunecky v. Nesis, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 6. Cosby v. G. Rodriquez, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 7. Brown, London, Pagan, Perez, Tendaji and Williams v. Davis, McClelland, Gama Patrick, Pendleton, Jurado, Rider, London, Mora, Villanueva, Rake, Khan, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 8. Dagit v. Ayala, Djurdjevic, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 9. Valenzuela and Boyd v. Sharp, Wilson, Jovanovich, Valle, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 10. Jaworski, Kroth, Robinson, and Romano v. Trianafillo, Laurenzana, Floyd, Shoshi, Flaster, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 11. Angers, Arnold, Antunez, Scott, Vail, and Zacarias v. Chavez, Stycznski, Gleezon, Stepney, Maravic, Graves, Murph, Schield, Rhei, Gonzalez, Johnson, Rojoas, Griffith, Oshaughnessy, Rodriquiez, Hernenadez, Laurenzana, (the "OC Defendants"), Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 12. Baskaran, Dittman, Pfeifer, and Romano v. Coleman, Loughran, Jonas, Shiels, Rhein, Jauregui, De Canto, Kilponen, Zuber, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 13. Anderson, Angers, Artis, Atchley, Bassett, Colbert, Craig, Escamilla, Freund, Gay, Gervasi, Geroge, Love-Hatlestad, Jones, Kerstetter, Larsen, Rafael_Nietes, Roberts, Rodriguez, Smith, Sowacke, Spreadbury, Vail, Wise, Yoon and Zartler v. Superintendent Brown, City of Chicago, John Doe Officers, and Officers in Exhibits A-G It is further ordered that the cases listed below are to be directly assigned to Judge Coleman and referred to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. Severed Cases to be Directly Assigned to Judge Coleman 1. Betzel, Reed Enigmann, Hoerty v. Gallegos, Wilson, Floyd, Bielfeldt, Mannion, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago 2. Reichold, Fansler, and Marshall v. Condreva Blake, Superintendent Brown and City of Chicago It is further ordered, for reasons of judicial efficiency, coordinated pretrial proceedings in the severed cases listed above should be presided over by Judge Coleman as provided for by IOP13(e) and Magistrate Judge Gilbert should be designated for these proceedings. The Clerk of Court shall docket this order in 20 CV 6851, Protesters in Support of Black Lives et al v. City of Chicago et al and each of the severed cases. Although the defendants do not object, plaintiffs are reminded that an application to proceed in forma pauperis petition is due within 15 days pursuant to Local Rule 3.3 in each of the severed cases. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/10/2023. Mailed notice. (lw, )
|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lw, ) |
| Filing 2 RECEIVED COMPLAINT and no copies by Archit Baskaran, Delaney Dittman, Bailey Pfeifer, Patrick Romano. (lw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
