Jordan v. Double Good Holdings, Inc.
Gregory Jordan |
Double Good Holdings, Inc. |
1:2023cv02289 |
April 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Steven C Seeger |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Gregory Jordan for leave to file First Amended Complaint (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on defendant's motions (Dckt. Nos. #8 and #10 ). Responses are due by June 8, 2023 and replies are due by June 22, 2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Double Good Holdings, Inc. in support of motion for judgment on the pleadings #10 (Rein, Eric) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. for judgment on the pleadings (Rein, Eric) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by Double Good Holdings, Inc. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 (Rein, Eric) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. (Rein, Eric) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. by Eric S. Rein (Rein, Eric) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Jordan as to Double Good Holdings, Inc. on 4/21/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by June 26, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gregory Jordan by Franklin Jara (Jara, Franklin) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gregory Jordan by Omar Tayseer Sulaiman (Sulaiman, Omar) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gregory Jordan by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT . Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20533003 filed by Gregory Jordan; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Badwan, Mohammed) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. (khg, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jordan v. Double Good Holdings, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gregory Jordan | |
Represented By: | Franklin Jara |
Represented By: | Omar Tayseer Sulaiman |
Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Double Good Holdings, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Eric S. Rein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.