Jordan v. Double Good Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gregory Jordan
Defendant: Double Good Holdings, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv02289
Filed: April 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Steven C Seeger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Gregory Jordan for leave to file First Amended Complaint (Badwan, Mohammed)
May 11, 2023 Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on defendant's motions (Dckt. Nos. #8 and #10 ). Responses are due by June 8, 2023 and replies are due by June 22, 2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
May 9, 2023 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Double Good Holdings, Inc. in support of motion for judgment on the pleadings #10 (Rein, Eric)
May 9, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. for judgment on the pleadings (Rein, Eric)
May 9, 2023 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by Double Good Holdings, Inc. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #8 (Rein, Eric)
May 9, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. (Rein, Eric)
May 9, 2023 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. by Eric S. Rein (Rein, Eric)
April 24, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Jordan as to Double Good Holdings, Inc. on 4/21/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. (Badwan, Mohammed)
April 12, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by June 26, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
April 12, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gregory Jordan by Franklin Jara (Jara, Franklin)
April 12, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gregory Jordan by Omar Tayseer Sulaiman (Sulaiman, Omar)
April 12, 2023 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Gregory Jordan by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed)
April 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT . Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20533003 filed by Gregory Jordan; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Badwan, Mohammed)
April 12, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, )
April 12, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Double Good Holdings, Inc. (khg, )
April 12, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Double Good Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Jordan
Represented By: Franklin Jara
Represented By: Omar Tayseer Sulaiman
Represented By: Mohammed Omar Badwan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Double Good Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Eric S. Rein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?