Boback v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff: Edward W. Boback
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Case Number: 1:2023cv02326
Filed: April 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy L Maldonado
Referring Judge: M David Weisman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Ling, Ernest)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable M. David Weisman for all further proceedings pursuant to local rule 40.3(c). Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 4/20/2023.(rp, )
April 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 73.1. Parties have consented to the reassignment. Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 4/19/2023. (axk, )
April 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: The parties filed a joint consent to exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge, this case will be reassigned. (ca, )
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Marvin, Cody)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Notification of Prior Case by Edward W. Boback (Marvin, Cody)
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Ling, Ernest)
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), Defendant is to file its answer and administrative record no later than 6/12/23. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record. The Social Security Administration's response brief is due 45 days after Plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after Defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge, and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. (ca, )
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (khg, )
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Edward W. Boback for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Marvin, Cody)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Edward W. Boback by Cody Thomas Marvin (Marvin, Cody)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Marvin, Cody)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Edward W. Boback; (Attachments: #1 AC decision)(Marvin, Cody)
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (khg, )
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (khg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boback v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward W. Boback
Represented By: Cody Thomas Marvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Represented By: AUSA - SSA
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?