Palanti v. Lawble, Inc. et al
| Deborah Palanti |
| Lawble, Inc., George A Simons and Scott Erickson |
| 1:2023cv02365 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SUR-REPLY by Defendants Scott Erickson, Lawble, Inc., George A Simons to motion to remand #10 , response in opposition to motion #14 (Defendants' Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to State Court) (Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendants' motion for leave to file a sur-reply (Dckt. No. #16 ) is hereby granted. Defendants have leave to file the sur-reply on the docket by June 9, 2023. If any party thinks that the Court wants a sur-sur-reply, that party has another think coming. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION by Defendants Scott Erickson, Lawble, Inc., George A Simons for leave to file Surreply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Surreply, #2 Exhibit 1 to Surreply)(Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY by Plaintiff Deborah Palanti to motion to remand #10 (Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to State Court) (Edelman, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 14
RESPONSE by Scott Erickson, Lawble, Inc., George A Simons in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Deborah Palanti to remand Case to State Court #10 (Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the motion to remand. (Dckt. No. #12 ) The response is due by May 12, 2023. In light of the motion to remand, the Court stays the obligation to respond to the complaint. The Court will reset the deadline if necessary after resolving that motion. Emailed notice (cdh, )
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by July 5, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer, plead, or otherwise respond to the complaint (Dckt. No. #6 ) is granted. Defendants shall respond to plaintiff's complaint by May 21, 2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Plaintiff Deborah Palanti to remand Case to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Edelman, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Deborah Palanti by Carly Roman (Roman, Carly)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Deborah Palanti by Tara Leigh Goodwin (Goodwin, Tara)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Deborah Palanti by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION by Defendants Lawble, Inc., George A Simons for extension of time to file answer regarding notice of removal, #1 Unopposed (Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Scott Erickson, Lawble, Inc., George A Simons by Emily Catherine Eggmann (Eggmann, Emily)
|
|
Filing 4
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Scott Erickson, Lawble, Inc., George A Simons by Mark L. Hanover (Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Lawble, Inc. (Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hanover, Mark)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE of Removal from The Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division, case number (2023CH02120) filed by Scott Erickson, Lawble, Inc., George A Simons Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20543078. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of George A. Simons in Support of Notice of Removal)(Hanover, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
