Awadallah v. Biomat USA INC
LORIA D AWADALLAH and Loria Awadallah |
Biomat USA INC |
1:2023cv02453 |
April 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Lindsay C Jenkins |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead #16 is granted. Defendant's response is due by June 23, 2023. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant Biomat USA INC for extension of time DEFENDANT'S UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Dishman, Neil) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff has timely filed an amended complaint in response to Defendant's motion to dismiss, pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(1)(B), that eliminates Count IX from the case. Defendant's motion to dismiss #9 is therefore denied as moot. Defendant's answer is due on or before June 13, 2023. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 14 NOTICE by Loria Awadallah re amended complaint #11 (Horak, Steven) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE by Loria Awadallahin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Biomat USA INC to dismiss DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT IX OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #9 (Horak, Steven) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: On the same day (5/16/2023) Defendant filed a motion to dismiss #9 , Plaintiff filed an amended complaint #11 . It is unclear whether the amended complaint was filed pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(1)(A) or if Plaintiff filed the amended complaint in response to the service of a motion to dismiss, pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(1)(B). Either way, the parties are to meet and confer and advise the court by May 24, 2023 whether briefing on the motion to dismiss remains necessary. If so, the parties should propose a briefing schedule. If not, the parties should indicate the date by which Defendants expects to respond to the amended complaint. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
Filing 11 AMENDED complaint by Loria Awadallah against Biomat USA INC (Horak, Steven) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Biomat USA INC in support of motion to dismiss #9 DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT IX OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Dishman, Neil) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Biomat USA INC to dismiss DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT IX OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Dishman, Neil) |
Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Biomat USA INC DEFENDANT BIOMAT USA, INC.'S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Dishman, Neil) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Biomat USA INC by Hannah Griffin Garlough (Garlough, Hannah) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Biomat USA INC by Neil Hunter Dishman (Dishman, Neil) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Loria Awadallah as to Biomat USA INC on 4/25/2023, answer due 5/16/2023. (Horak, Steven) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: An in-person initial status hearing is set for 7/19/2023 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2119. Virtual hearing requests must be pre-approved by the Court. If you need to appear virtually, contact Judge Jenkins' courtroom deputy at least three business days in advance of the hearing to make the request. The parties are directed to file a joint Initial Status Report by 7/12/2023. The report should comply with the requirements set forth in the Initial Status Report standing order, which can be found at Judge Jenkins's web page @ (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov, "District Judges, to "Judge Lindsay Jenkins", to "Initial Status Hearings" under Case Management Procedures"). The parties must follow all the standing orders for Judge Jenkins and all Local Rules, which can be found at the same web page. At the Initial Status hearing, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; and (3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Biomat USA INC (smb, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LORIA D AWADALLAH by Steven D Horak (Horak, Steven) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Horak, Steven) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by LORIA D AWADALLAH; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20554851.(Horak, Steven) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (exr, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (exr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.