Dyson v. Circuit Court of Cook County
| Stefannie Dyson |
| Thomas Dart and Circuit Court of Cook County |
| 1:2023cv02521 |
| April 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Petitioner may proceed with Claim One (denial of bail claim), Claim Two (speedy trial claim) and Claim Three (double jeopardy claim). Claim Four (lack of due process and right to remedy claim) is dismissed. Respondent is directed to respond to Claims One, Two and Three of the habeas corpus petition #1 by July 11, 2023. The Clerk is directed to: (1) terminate Respondent Dart; (2) add Circuit Court of Cook County as Respondent; and (3) alter the case caption to Dyson v. Circuit Court of Cook County. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/6/2023. Mailed notice (rp, )
|
|
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Petitioner Stefannie Dyson. (jj, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jj, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for writ of habeas corpus and no copies by Stefannie Dyson. (Exhibits). (Envelope postmarked 4/15/2023).(jj, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jj, )
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jj, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
