Birdsall v. Great Dane LLC
| SAMANTHA BIRDSALL |
| GREAT DANE LLC |
| 1:2023cv02715 |
| May 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Charles P Kocoras |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: In light of the Notice of Acceptance of Offer #7 filed on 5/25/23, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68, judgment is entered against Defendant Great Dane LLC. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Acceptance with Offer of Judgment by Samantha Birdsall -- Plaintiff's Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Letter and Offer of Judgment)(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samantha Birdsall as to Great Dane LLC on 5/3/2023, answer due 5/24/2023. (Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Great Dane LLC by Zachary Adam Pestine (Pestine, Zachary) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Great Dane LLC by Mark Douglas Brookstein (Brookstein, Mark) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Great Dane LLC by David N. Michael (Michael, David) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SAMANTHA BIRDSALL by Joshua Jon Sanford (Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by SAMANTHA BIRDSALL; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20591485. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join as to Samantha Birdsall, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Summons)(Sanford, Joshua) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Birdsall v. Great Dane LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SAMANTHA BIRDSALL | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Jon Sanford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GREAT DANE LLC | |
| Represented By: | David N. Michael |
| Represented By: | Mark Douglas Brookstein |
| Represented By: | Zachary Adam Pestine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
