Stallworth v. Hach Company
| Irisa M. Stallworth |
| Hach Company |
| 1:2023cv02859 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John F Kness |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a "Joint Stipulation of Dismissal" #10 . Because the Stipulation was filed before the opposing party served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed with prejudice consistent with the terms of the Stipulation and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. The hearing set for 7/20/2023 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hach Company (Cederoth, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer #8 is granted. Defendant must answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff complaint on or before 6/21/2023. Mailed notice (ef, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendant Hach Company for extension of time to file answer or Otherwise Plead in Response to Plaintiff's Complaint (Cederoth, Michael) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hach Company by Christopher James DeGroff (DeGroff, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hach Company by Michael J. Cederoth (Cederoth, Michael) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Irisa M. Stallworth as to Hach Company on 5/10/2023, answer due 5/31/2023. (Taylor, Alexander) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 5/9/2023: Telephonic initial status hearing is set for 7/20/2023 at 9:00 AM. Consistent with Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to meet and conduct a planning conference in advance of the initial status hearing. No later than ten days before the status hearing, the parties shall jointly complete and file on the docket a report that provides the information required by the Court's model Joint Initial Status Report, which can be found at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?Iu9/vqz23r5X7AkWx/nLtg== (see link entitled "Joint Initial Status Report"). If all Defendants have not yet been served or have not yet responded to requests to draft the required Joint Initial Status Report, Plaintiff must file the report on its own and must inform the Court of that circumstance. The parties are to use the following call-in number: 888-684-8852, conference code 3796759. The public and media representatives may have access to the hearing via the same number. Audio recording of the hearing is not permitted; violations of this prohibition may result in sanctions. Participants are directed to keep their device muted when they are not speaking. Mailed notice(ef, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Hach Company (lm, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Irisa M. Stallworth by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Irisa M. Stallworth by Alexander James Taylor (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Irisa M. Stallworth; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20611749. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Taylor, Alexander) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stallworth v. Hach Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Irisa M. Stallworth | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Alexander James Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hach Company | |
| Represented By: | Christopher James DeGroff |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Cederoth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
