Rodriguez-Jimenez v. DynaCom Management, LLC et al
| Luis M. Rodriguez-Jimenez |
| DynaCom Management, LLC, Mland Maintenance LLC,, DynaCom Management, Inc.,, Naperville Maintenance, Inc.,, Allen Construction Services, Ali Setork and Mina Setork |
| 1:2023cv02893 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Mland Maintenance LLC,. Mland Maintenance LLC, waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Luchsinger, Michael) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Mland Maintenance LLC, by Michael Robert Luchsinger (Luchsinger, Michael) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Mland Maintenance LLC, by Masood Syed Ali (Ali, Masood) |
| Filing 10 Defendants' Rule 68 Offer of Judgment by Ali Setork, Mina Setork DynaCom Management, LLC and Mland Maintenance LLC (Danahey, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 8/7/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Ali Setork. Ali Setork waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Danahey, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Mina Setork. Mina Setork waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Danahey, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by DynaCom Management, LLC. DynaCom Management, Inc., waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Danahey, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 JURY Demand (Danahey, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DynaCom Management, LLC by Ryan Andrew Danahey (Danahey, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Luis M. Rodriguez-Jimenez by John Craig Ireland (Ireland, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Luis M. Rodriguez-Jimenez; jury demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20618783.(Ireland, John) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
