Badal v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Farha Zaia Badal |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2023cv02999 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Young B Kim |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Flores, Nicole) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: In light of the consent, the briefing schedule entered on May 31, 2023, (R. 4), is stricken. The government is ordered to file its answer by July 11, 2023. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is due by August 10, 2023. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing the final agency decision must include a section with a recitation of the relevant facts and a separate section identifying the statement of the issues presented in the brief. The statement of issues must set out a numbered list of issues for the court's consideration. The issue statement must also identify with specificity the aspects of the Commissioner's final decision that Plaintiff challenges, along with a concise explanation of why Plaintiff believes the challenged aspects are unsupported by substantial evidence. The government's response and/or cross-motion for summary judgment is due by September 11, 2023. In the argument section of its response the government must address each issue Plaintiff identifies in his or her brief's statement of the issues. Plaintiff's reply is due by September 25, 2023, but one is not required. Mailed notice (ec ) |
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 6/12/2023. (ph, )
|
| Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Young B. Kim, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 06/09/2023. (rc, ) |
| Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (McDonough, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision subject to review is due within 60 days of the filing of the administrative record (no motion required). The Social Security Administration's motion to affirm the decision subject to review and its brief in support are due 45 days after plaintiff's brief is filed. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due 14 days after defendant's brief is filed. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week before the due date and upon good cause shown. Additionally, on or before the deadline for the filing of the administrative record, the parties shall file a joint status report in which they indicate (i) whether the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (ii) whether they will agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, they shall execute and file with the Court the joint consent form included as part of the Clerk's Notice previously filed in this case. If the parties agree to a voluntary remand to the Commissioner, they must file an agreed motion for remand. Mailed notice (smm) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION of Nicole Suzanne Flores as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (Flores, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 The parties are required to provide notice of any prior case filed by Plaintiff that resulted in a remand for further administrative proceedings. If there was a prior remanded case that is not identified on the Civil Cover Sheet in this action, the parties are ordered to file a Notification of the prior case within 30 days. That Notification is to provide the case name, number and assigned judge. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Farha Zaia Badal; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20633365. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonough, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
