Cregan v. Doe, et al
| Carlos Dax Cregan |
| John Doe, Chicago Police Department and City Of Chicago |
| 1:2023cv03059 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Andrea R Wood |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 LETTER from Carlos Dax Cregan. (Enveloped postmarked 07/06/2023) (rc, ) |
| Filing 11 MAIL RETURNED, for document #6 sent to Carlos Dax Cregan returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to 104 W Front St. Bloomington, IL 61701 (evw, ) |
| Filing 10 MAIL RETURNED, for document #6 sent to Carlos Dax Cregan returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to McLean County Detention Facility 104 W Front Street, Bloomington, Il 61701 (jcc, ) |
| Filing 9 LETTER from Carlos Dax Cregan. (Envelope postmarked 06/20/2023) (rc, ) |
| MAILED Order #6 dated 06/20/2023 to Plaintiff Carlos Dax Cregan. (rc, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied for lack of a sufficient showing of indigence. By 8/1/2023, Plaintiff must pay the full statutory filing fee of $402 if he wishes to proceed further with this lawsuit. If he fails to comply by the aforementioned date, the Court will summarily dismiss this case. Plaintiff is advised that he has a continuing obligation to keep the Court apprised of his current address, and failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to comply with a court order and for want of prosecution. The Court defers its initial review of Plaintiff's complaint until Plaintiff resolves his fee status. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 6/20/2023. Mailed notice. (jj, )
|
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED, for 73.1b Clerk's Notice and Blank Joint Consent Form sent to Carlos Dax Cregan returned as undeliverable, return to sender. New address found, re-mailed to 1931 Clark St. Front Apt, Whiting, IN 46394, along with blank pro se appearance form. (axk, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Carlos Dax Cregan for attorney representation. (jj, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Carlos Dax Cregan for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (rc, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (rc, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and by Carlos Dax Cregan. (Envelope not postmarked) (rc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (rc, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Carlos Dax Cregan. (rc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
