Escobedo Martinez et al v. Garland et al
| Jorge Luis Escobedo Martinez and Maria Teresa Martinez Ruedas |
| MERRICK B GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, Mark Hanson, USCIS and Merrick B. Garland |
| 1:2023cv03345 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jorge Luis Escobedo Martinez as to Alejandro Mayorkas on 6/14/2023, answer due 7/5/2023. (Colsant, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Mark Hanson, Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Mark Hanson, Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jorge Luis Escobedo Martinez, Maria Teresa Martinez Ruedas as to Merrick B. Garland on 6/8/2023, answer due 6/29/2023. (Colsant, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jorge Luis Escobedo Martinez as to Mark Hanson on 6/5/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. (Colsant, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Jorge Luis Escobedo Martinez, Maria Teresa Martinez Ruedas by Joseph L. Colsant (Colsant, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 8/9/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Attorneys are reminded to become familiar with the Court's local rules. Attorney for Plaintiff should file appearances for all appropriate parties. Mailed notice. (dm, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Colsant, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jorge Luis Escobedo Martinez; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20678286.(Colsant, Joseph) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (evw, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to MERRICK B GARLAND, Mark Hanson, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (evw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
