Blue et al v. Bridge Legal Support Services LLC et al
| Shania Blue, Bob Megnath, Pedro Pacheco, Tori Buie and Theresa Jackson |
| Bridge Legal Support Services LLC, Bridge Legal Holdings LLC and Bridge Legal Technology LLC |
| 1:2023cv03487 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Erin Anne Murphy, I for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #13 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 8/9/2023 at 08:30 AM. (Murphy, Erin) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendants Bridge Legal Holdings LLC, Bridge Legal Support Services LLC, Bridge Legal Technology LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint,, #1 (Murphy, Erin) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Defendants' unopposed extension motion to respond to the complaint #8 is granted to 08/01/2023. The initial tracking status hearing of 07/28/2023 is reset to 08/11/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report, R. 4-1, by 08/03/2023. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pedro Pacheco, Tori Buie, Theresa Jackson, Shania Blue, Bob Megnath as to Bridge Legal Holdings LLC on 6/9/2023, answer due 6/30/2023. (Frisch, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pedro Pacheco, Tori Buie, Theresa Jackson, Shania Blue, Bob Megnath as to Bridge Legal Support Services LLC on 6/9/2023, answer due 6/30/2023. (Frisch, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Erin Anne Murphy, I for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #8 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 6/29/2023 at 08:30 AM. (Murphy, Erin) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Defendants Bridge Legal Holdings LLC, Bridge Legal Support Services LLC, Bridge Legal Technology LLC for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint,, #1 (Murphy, Erin) |
| Filing 7 JURY Demand (Murphy, Erin) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Bridge Legal Holdings LLC, Bridge Legal Support Services LLC, Bridge Legal Technology LLC by Erin Anne Murphy, I (Murphy, Erin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shania Blue as to Bridge Legal Technology LLC on 6/13/2023, answer due 7/4/2023. (Frisch, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/28/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 07/20/2023. Plaintiffs must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Bridge Legal Holdings LLC, Bridge Legal Support Services LLC, Bridge Legal Technology LLC (khg, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs of Consent to Join Filings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join Filings)(Ash, Charles) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Shania Blue, Tori Buie, Theresa Jackson, Bob Megnath, Pedro Pacheco by Charles R. Ash, IV (Ash, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pedro Pacheco, Tori Buie, Theresa Jackson, Shania Blue, Bob Megnath; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20698677. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1- Consent to Join for Shania Blue, #3 Exhibit 2-Consent to Join for Bob Megnath, #4 Exhibit 3- Consent to Join Tori Buie, #5 Exhibit 4- Consent to Join for Pedro Pacheco, #6 Exhibit 5 -Consent to Join for Theresa Jackson, #7 Exhibit 6-Exemplary Contractor Agreement, #8 Exhibit 7- Exemplary Pay Statement)(Frisch, Andrew) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (evw, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
