Shelton v. AT&T Services Inc.
| Jarod Shelton |
| AT&T Services Inc. |
| 1:2023cv03538 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Nancy L Maldonado |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: The Court has received Plaintiff's motion to withdraw his motion to compel discovery #24 . Plaintiff's motion is granted, and the evidentiary hearing on Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings #16 is reset for 12/1/23 at 9:30 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1925. The Court reminds parties to file a joint status report by 11/29/23, indicating the witnesses each side intends to call and the estimated duration of testimony. (ca, ) |
| Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: Motion for leave to appear pro hac vice by James P. de Haan #22 is granted. (ca, ) |
| Filing 24 MOTION by Plaintiff Jarod Shelton to withdraw text entry,, #23 , Expedited referral to magistrate judge #21 withdraw motion to compel Presented before District Judge (Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: Plaintiff has informed the Court that he would be willing to withdraw his motion to compel discovery #19 to prevent a delay in the evidentiary hearing originally set for 12/1/23 #16 . The Court is amenable to resetting the evidentiary hearing for 12/1/23 if Plaintiff chooses to withdraw his motion to compel discovery, which will take time to decide. In the event that Plaintiff withdraws his motion to compel discovery, the parties should file a joint status report by 11/29/23, indicating the witnesses each side intends to call and the estimated duration of testimony. (ca, ) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21318423. Presented before District Judge (James, de Haan) |
| Filing 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: motion to compel #19 , discovery supervision and for settlement conference.(ca, ) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado:The Court has received Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery #19 . This motion and discovery supervision are hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. In light of the motion to compel, the Court will strike the 12/1/23 evidentiary hearing on the motion to compel arbitration, which will be reset after Magistrate Judge Gilbert's resolution of the motion to compel. The referral to Magistrate Judge Gilbert shall include a referral for a settlement conference, if and when the parties desire one. (ca, ) |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Plaintiff Jarod Shelton to compel Discovery Answers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Discovery answers, #2 Exhibit Good faith statement)(Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE by AT&T Services Inc. of Service of Discovery upon Plaintiff (Gage, Kenneth) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by Jarod Shelton of Service of Discovery upon Defendant for Motion to Compel Arbitration (Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: Motion hearing held on 9/19/23 via WebEx. The Court will hold an evidentiary hearing on 12/1/23 at 9:30 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1925 on Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings #9 . Given the factual disputes raised by the parties, the Court will allow limited discovery regarding the receipt of the email and arbitration agreement at issue and the factual matters raised in the parties' respective declarations. As explained on the record, the parties should re-engage in discussions regarding a possible resolution of the case. At any time, the parties may contact the Courtroom Deputy via telephone or email if they request a referral to Magistrate Judge Gilbert for a settlement conference. (ca, ) |
| Filing 15 REPLY by Defendant AT&T Services Inc. to motion to compel #9 (Gage, Kenneth) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Jarod Shelton in Opposition to motion to compel #9 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Plaintiff, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Marcus Coleman, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A and for Declarations)(Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: In light of Defendants' pending motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings #9 , the Court strikes the status hearing on 8/15/23. The motion hearing set for 9/19/23 at 10:30 a.m. via WebEx stands. (ca, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado:Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings #9 is due by 8/18/23; reply due by 9/1/23. Hearing on the motion is set for 9/19/2023 at 10:30 AM. by Webex. The dial in number for the public is 650-479-3207 ; Access code 2315 137 8504. The parties will receive a Webex invitation by email. (ca, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings #9 . By 7/27/23, the parties shall email the Courtroom Deputy an agreed proposed briefing schedule for Defendant's motion. (ca, ) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by AT&T Services Inc. in support of motion to compel #9 arbitration and stay proceedings (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brandy Giordano, #2 Declaration of Rose Floyd, #3 Declaration of Kenneth Gage, #4 Declaration of Michael Albert)(Gage, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant AT&T Services Inc. to compel arbitration and stay proceedings (Gage, Kenneth) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: Motion for leave to appear pro hac vice by Allison Talker #7 is granted. (ca, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20786603. (Talker, Allison) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado:Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer the complaint by 7/24/23 #5 is granted. (ca, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant AT&T Services Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Gage, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado: By 8/8/23, the parties shall file a joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. A Rule 16 initial status hearing is set for 8/15/23 at 10:00 a.m. by WebEx video conference. The dial-in number for the public is: 650-479-3207; access code is: 23033221828. The parties will receive a WebEx invitation by email. During the video hearing, the parties should turn off their cameras and mute their microphones until their case is called. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court-imposed sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. (ca, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Nancy L. Maldonado. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kra, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kra, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant AT&T Services Inc. (rc, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jarod Shelton by Steven D Horak (Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jarod Shelton; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20706741.(Horak, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shelton v. AT&T Services Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jarod Shelton | |
| Represented By: | Steven D Horak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AT&T Services Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Allison Rebecca Talker |
| Represented By: | Kenneth W. Gage |
| Represented By: | de Haan Paul James |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
