Tejada Gonzalez v. Rosas Tamales, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Griselda Tejada Gonzalez
Defendant: Rosas Tamales, Inc. and Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce
Case Number: 1:2023cv03580
Filed: June 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Referring Judge: Gabriel A Fuentes
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2023 Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter coming before the magistrate judge on referral (doc. #12 ) for discovery supervision, the Court has reviewed the parties' status report (doc. #8), and the district court's discovery schedule (doc. #9 ) stands. The parties are further directed to review the Court's Standing Order for Civil Cases Before Magistrate Judge Fuentes, available on the Court's website. A further joint written status report is due by noon on noon on 12/7/23; if any expert discovery is anticipated, it must be proposed with a schedule at that time. Further, the parties are invited, if they wish, to communicate their pronouns for counsel or clients to the courtroom deputy, Lauren Knight, at 312-818-6514. Mailed notice (ber, )
August 3, 2023 Filing 12 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision (including the authority to adjust all deadlines). (mw, ) Emailed notice.
August 3, 2023 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the updated status report, R. 10-1, the disputes over employee status and enterprise coverage are not subject matter jurisdiction disputes. Instead, they go to the merits of the FLSA claims. In any event, discovery supervision is now referred to the magistrate judge (including the authority to adjust all deadlines). The tracking status hearing of 08/04/2023 is reset to 11/17/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, )
July 28, 2023 Filing 10 RESPONSE by Defendants Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce, Rosas Tamales, Inc. to terminate hearings,,,, set case scheduling order,,,, set deadlines/hearings,,, #9 On 7/24/2023 Minute Entry (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Joint Status Report 7/28/23)(Groenewold, Joel)
July 24, 2023 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 8, it is not clear whether the defense participated in writing it. On or before 07/28/2023, the defense shall file a concise status report stating whether it participated in writing R. 8, and if not, why not and whether the report should reflect any other information. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due on 08/31/2023. The first round of written discovery requests must be issued by 08/31/2023. Fact discovery shall close on 01/15/2024. Rule 16(b) deadline to add parties or to amend pleadings is 11/27/2023. No early summary judgment motions may be filed without prior leave of Court. The tracking status hearing of 07/28/2023 is reset to 08/04/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (cn).
July 20, 2023 Filing 8 STATUS Report by Griselda Tejada Gonzalez (Schlade, Daniel)
July 5, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Griselda Tejada Gonzalez as to Rosas Tamales, Inc.. (Schlade, Daniel)
July 5, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Griselda Tejada Gonzalez as to Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce. (Schlade, Daniel)
June 30, 2023 Filing 5 RESPONSE by Defendants Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce, Rosas Tamales, Inc. Answer to complaint (Groenewold, Joel)
June 30, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce, Rosas Tamales, Inc. by Joel David Groenewold (Groenewold, Joel)
June 8, 2023 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/28/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 07/20/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
June 7, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, )
June 7, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, )
June 7, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce, Rosas Tamales, Inc. (smb, )
June 6, 2023 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Griselda Tejada Gonzalez by Daniel I Schlade 1:23-cv-03580 Tejada Gonzalez v. Rosas Tamales, Inc. et al (Schlade, Daniel)
June 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT 1:23-cv-03580 Tejada Gonzalez v. Rosas Tamales, Inc. et al filed by Griselda Tejada Gonzalez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20711095. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schlade, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tejada Gonzalez v. Rosas Tamales, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Griselda Tejada Gonzalez
Represented By: Daniel I Schlade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosas Tamales, Inc.
Represented By: Joel David Groenewold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce
Represented By: Joel David Groenewold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?