Walker v. Haberkorn et al
| Joshua Walker |
| Catherine Haberkorn, Lauren Maniatis, Lauren Edidin, Patricia Berlinsky, Sophia Atcherson and Erin Antonietti |
| 1:2023cv03730 |
| June 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Plaintiff paid the filing fee, R. 7, so the complaint is now under advisement for screening review. The tracking status hearing of 09/22/2023 is reset to 10/27/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (mw, ) |
| Filing 10 LETTER from Joshua Walker dated 09/09/2023. (Envelope postmarked 09/11/2023) (daj, ) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Joshua Walker; Jury Demand (Exhibits). (Envelope postmarked 6/9/23) (aee, ) |
| MAILED Copy of Order dated 8/14/23, and a blank in forma pauperis application (prisoner version) to Plaintiff. (aee, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Order, the application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. The Plaintiff is directed to either (1) submit a renewed application that is certified by a trust fund officer and that includes a copy of Plaintiff's trust-fund statement covering the six months immediately preceding the filing of the complaint; or (2) pre-pay the full statutory filing fee of $402.00. Failure to comply with this order by 09/12/2023 will result in dismissal of this case. The motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice as explained in the order. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a blank in forma pauperis application (prisoner version) and a copy of this order. To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a tracking status hearing is set for 09/22/2023 at 8:30 a.m. Mailed notice (mw, )
|
| Filing 5 STATUS Request by Joshua Walker (Envelope not postmarked). (emc, ) |
| MAILED docket text entry of Clerk's Notice to Joshua Walker (emc, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua Walker for attorney representation. (aee, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joshua Walker for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (aee, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (aee, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Joshua Walker (Exhibits). (Envelope postmarked 6/9/23) (aee, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (aee, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
