Hyneman v. Ford Motor Company
| Paulette Hyneman |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY |
| 1:2023cv03855 |
| June 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: Remote video settlement conference held on 10/2/23 Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: Remote settlement conference set for 10/2/2023 at 2:00 p.m. In advance of the settlement conference, counsel for the parties will receive the instructions for participation in the remote settlement conference and for participation in a brief pre-settlement conference practice session with the Court's staff. Plaintiff's settlement demand letter in conformance with the Court's Standing Order on Settlement Conferences and defendant's conforming settlement offer letter are due on or before 9/28/2023. Each party shall email a copy of its letter to Judge Cummings' chambers on the same day that it is provided to opposing counsel. The settlement letters shall be submitted to the Court by e-mail to the Court's settlement correspondence e-mail address (Settlement_Correspondence_Cummings@ilnd.uscourts.gov). Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the joint motion to extend time for filing initial status report #17 is granted. The Court extends the parties' deadline to file their joint initial status report to and including 14 days after the conclusion of a settlement conference to be scheduled before Judge Cummings. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 17 MOTION by Plaintiff Paulette Hyneman for extension of time to file Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Joint initial Status Report Presented before District Judge , MOTION by Plaintiff Paulette Hyneman for extension of time Presented before District Judge (Hunt, Keith) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: This case was reassigned to this court for settlement. The parties are ordered to submit a joint status report regarding settlement to this Court's settlement correspondence mailbox (Settlement_Correspondence_Cummings@ilnd.uscourts.gov) at their earliest convenience but no later than 9/8/23. In their status report, the parties shall address the issues set forth in the first paragraph of the second page of the Court's Standing Order For Settlement Conferences and provide the dates that the parties are mutually available in October for a remote video settlement conference. The deadlines for the submission of settlement letters described in the Standing Order and the date for the settlement conference will be promptly set after the joint status report is received. Mailed notice (cc, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants the parties' joint motion for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint and request to schedule settlement conference #10 . The case is in the process of being reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cummings, pursuant to his agreement, in order for Judge Cummings to conduct a settlement conference as requested by the parties. The Court extends Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to and including 14 days after the conclusion of a settlement conference to be scheduled before Judge Cummings. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 15 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that 23 CV 3855, Hyneman v. Ford Motor Company, is currently pending before the Hon. Franklin U. Valderrama and the Hon. Jeffrey T. Gilbert as the designated magistrate judge; and It further appearing that with consent of Judge Valderrama and by agreement that Magistrate Judge Cummings be the designated magistrate judge in 23 CV 3855, Hyneman v. Ford Motor Company; therefore It is hereby ordered that Magistrate Judge Cummings is to be the designated magistrate judge in 23 CV 3855, Hyneman v. Ford Motor Company. Case reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings for all further proceedings.. Signed by Executive Committee on 8/24/2023.(jh, ) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Emily Elizabeth Dory (Dory, Emily) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Mark Howard Boyle (Boyle, Mark) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Karen Kies DeGrand (DeGrand, Karen) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Ford Motor Company for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Joint) and Request to Schedule Settlement Conference (Nemechek, Kathleen) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Ford Motor Company (Nemechek, Kathleen) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Timothy Scott Millman (Millman, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ford Motor Company by Kathleen M. Nemechek (Nemechek, Kathleen) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Paulette Hyneman. Ford Motor Company waiver sent on 7/13/2023, answer due 9/11/2023. (Hunt, Delaney) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 09/05/2023 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc). |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Paulette Hyneman by Delaney Adams Hunt (Hunt, Delaney) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Paulette Hyneman by Keith L. Hunt (Hunt, Keith) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hunt, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Paulette Hyneman; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20748837. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Hunt, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
