Miller v. L'Oreal USA Inc. et al
Equilla Miller |
L'Oreal USA Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, Strength of Nature LLC, Godrej Son Holdings Inc., DABUR INTERNATIONAL LTD., Dabur International USA Ltd., Namaste Laboratories LLC, AFAM Concept Inc, MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Dabur International, LTD, Namaste Laboratories, LLC and AFAM Concept, Inc. |
1:2023cv03985 |
June 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to Strength of Nature, LLC on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to Softsheen-Carson LLC on 7/20/2023, answer due 8/10/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to Namaste Laboratories, LLC on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc. on 8/1/2023, answer due 8/22/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to L'Oreal USA, Inc. on 7/20/2023, answer due 8/10/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to Loreal USA Products, Inc. on 7/20/2023, answer due 8/10/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Equilla Miller as to Dabur International USA Ltd.. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to Dabur International, LTD on 7/25/2023, answer due 8/15/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equilla Miller as to AFAM Concept, Inc. on 7/28/2023, answer due 8/18/2023. (Gross, Vanessa) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants AFAM Concept Inc, DABUR INTERNATIONAL LTD., Dabur International USA Ltd., Godrej Son Holdings Inc., L'Oreal USA Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, SoftSheen-Carson LLC, Strength of Nature LLC (smb, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Equilla Miller by Vanessa H. Gross (Gross, Vanessa) |
Filing 2 First AMENDED complaint by Equilla Miller against AFAM Concept Inc, DABUR INTERNATIONAL LTD., Dabur International USA Ltd., Godrej Son Holdings Inc., L'Oreal USA Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, SoftSheen-Carson LLC, Strength of Nature LLC (Gross, Vanessa) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (smb, ) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-03985 Miller v. L'Oreal USA Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (nsf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Equilla Miller; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20763238. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gross, Vanessa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.