Bank of Hope v. P and L Building IP LLC et al
| Bank of Hope |
| P and L Building IP LLC and In Ja Park |
| 1:2023cv04028 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Franklin U Valderrama |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #6 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), this case is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bank of Hope Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(i) (Gipson, Brian) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 09/06/2023 the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Emailed notice (axc). |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants P and L Building IP LLC, In Ja Park (axk,) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bank of Hope by Brian James Gipson (Gipson, Brian) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Gipson, Brian) |
Filing 2
ORDER: #Local Rule 3.1# requires at the time of filing a case, plaintiff's counsel, or if the case is filed pro se, the plaintiff shall file with the original papers a completed designation sheet (civil cover sheet). No civil cover sheet was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Bank of Hope is directed to file the #Civil Cover Sheet# within 14 days of this notification. Signed by the Executive Committee. (jcc, )
|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jcc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Bank of Hope; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20769066.(Gipson, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
