HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD. v. Li et al
Plaintiff: HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD.
Defendant: Xin Li, Ruixiang Nie and Z APPs
Case Number: 1:2023cv04066
Filed: June 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Charles P Kocoras
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2023 Filing 7 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (kl, )
July 18, 2023 Filing 6 LETTER from Margaret Claudia Redshaw dated 6/29/23 with Trademark information. (kl, )
July 5, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Xin Li, Ruixiang Nie, Z APPs. (rc, )
June 29, 2023 Filing 5 MAILED Copyright Request Letter to Plaintiff's counsel Margaret Claudia Redshaw. (jn, )
June 27, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, )
June 27, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (evw, )
June 26, 2023 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD. (Redshaw, Margaret)
June 26, 2023 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD. by Margaret Claudia Redshaw (Redshaw, Margaret)
June 26, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Redshaw, Margaret)
June 26, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20772468.(Redshaw, Margaret)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD. v. Li et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HANGZHOU YINGSHITONG TECHNOLOGY LTD.
Represented By: Margaret Claudia Redshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xin Li
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruixiang Nie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Z APPs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?