Bradley v. Hain et al
| Deandre Bradley |
| Ron Hain |
| 1:2023cv04219 |
| June 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ENTERED JUDGMENT, Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/25/2023: Mailed notice. (jk2, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court grants Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 . The requirement for Petitioner to pay the five-dollar filing fee at the outset of this case is waived. The Court denies Petitioner's amended habeas corpus petition #5 on the merits. Any pending motions are denied as moot. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment dismissing the habeas corpus petition. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/25/2023: Mailed notice. (jk2, )
|
| Filing 5 RECEIVED AMENDED PETITION for writ for habeas corpus relief filed by Deandre Bradley against Ron Hain. (Exhibits) (Envelope postmark 7/6/2023) (ph, ) |
| MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Deandre Bradley. (ph, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ph, ) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Deandre Bradley dated 6-18-23. (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Deandre Bradley for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (ph, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus (Writ Federal Habeas Corpus) filed by Deandre Bradley against Ron Hain. (Envelope postmark 6/22/2023) (ph, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bradley v. Hain et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Deandre Bradley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ron Hain | |
| Represented By: | Chief of Criminal Appeals |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
