Hoskins v. Dart et al
| Joshua Hoskins |
| Thomas Dart and Mr. Stlak |
| 1:2023cv04312 |
| June 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's motion to allow Plaintiff to withdraw his complaint #7 is denied. Plaintiff's motion was electronically filed on September 12, 2023; however, Plaintiff's complaint was already dismissed on September 10, 2023, for failure to state a claim and as frivolous. The matter remains closed. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 7/19/2023: Mailed notice (daj, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins for the Court to allow plaintiff to withdraw his complaint and for the Court to take notice in regards to plaintiff IFP Application show cause. (aee, ) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING cover sheet by Joshua Hoskins. (aee, ) |
| EMAILED Copy of Order dated 7/10/23 to the Court's Fiscal Department. (aee, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to immediately deduct $4.36 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order (100% of Plaintiff's income - this includes gifts, prison payroll, settlements, etc. - when it meets statutory minimums, must be devoted toward his filing fees). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to (1) send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Dixon Correctional Center and to the Court's Fiscal Department. However, summonses shall not issue. Plaintiff's motion to not dismiss his complaint #4 is denied. Plaintiff's complaint #1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim because it is time barred on its face. In addition, the Court finds that the complaint is frivolous in light of the obvious and conceded time bar. This dismissal counts as a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 7/10/2023. Mailed notice (aee, )
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (aee, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (exr, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins for the court to not dismiss plaintiff complaint (exr, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Joshua Hoskins for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (exr, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (exr, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Joshua Hoskins (exr, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (exr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
