Guza v. Aldi, Inc. Illinois
| Sherry Guza |
| Aldi, Inc. Illinois |
| 1:2023cv04313 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal, this action is dismissed with prejudice and without right to refile or reinstate. Each party shall bear their own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. All pending dates before this court are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sherry Guza by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sherry Guza (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 9/14/2023, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sherry Guza by Alexander James Taylor (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sherry Guza by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sherry Guza; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20801701. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Badwan, Mohammed) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (smb, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (smb, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Aldi, Inc. Illinois (emc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guza v. Aldi, Inc. Illinois | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sherry Guza | |
| Represented By: | Alexander James Taylor |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Chad William Eisenback |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aldi, Inc. Illinois | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
