Alfred v. Dabur USA, Inc. et al
| Andrea LaShaun Alfred |
| Dabur USA, Inc., Namaste Laboratories, LLC, L'ORAL USA, INC.,, L'ORAL USA PRODUCTS, INC, Strength of Nature, LLC, GODREJ CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LTD, GODREJ SON HOLDINGS, INC., SOFT SHEEN-CARSON LLC,, JF Labs, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc., Dabur USA Inc, Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. and Soft Sheen Carson, LLC |
| 1:2023cv04358 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED First Amended Complaint (Munoz, Jose Luis) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Andrea LaShaun Alfred by Jose Luis Munoz (Munoz, Jose Luis) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jb, ) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:23-cv-4358 Alfred v. Dabur USA, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: IN RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ). (ph, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Andrea LaShaun Alfred; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BILNDC-20805663. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Munoz, Jose Luis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
