Moralez v. Army Board of Correction of Military Records
Frederick Jesse Moralez |
Army Board of Correction of Military Records |
1:2023cv04388 |
July 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
LaShonda A Hunt |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Correction regarding #2 (axk, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Initial Status Report for New Case by 9/19/23. A template for the report can be found on Judge Hunt's webpage on the Court's website under "New and Reassigned Cases." A telephonic initial status hearing is set for 9/26/23 at 10:00 AM. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: 877-336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media may call in to listen to the hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting court proceedings. Mailed notice. (cdh, ) |
MAILED copy of the Clerk's Notice entry along with the Joint Consent Form to Plaintiff Frederick Jesse Moralez. (ph, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (ph, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Army Board of Correction of Military Records. (ph, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Frederick Jesse Moralez for attorney representation. (ph, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Frederick Jesse Moralez. (ph, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ph, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Frederick Jesse Moralez. (Exhibits) (ph, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ph, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moralez v. Army Board of Correction of Military Records | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frederick Jesse Moralez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Army Board of Correction of Military Records | |
Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.