BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Trexam Transport LLC et al
Plaintiff: BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant: Trexam Transport LLC and Renald Exama
Case Number: 1:2023cv04437
Filed: July 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2023 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the status report, R. 9, and the docket (including the returns of service, R. 7, 8, and the complaint, R. 1), the Defendants are deemed to be in default for failing to timely respond to the complaint after successful service. The Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment by 09/08/2023. Any respond to the motion is due on 09/15/2023. The tracking status hearing of 09/01/2023 is reset to 09/22/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, )
August 24, 2023 Filing 9 STATUS Report (Initial) by BMO Harris Bank N.A. (Chapin, Aaron)
August 23, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BMO Harris Bank N.A. as to Trexam Transport LLC on 7/13/2023, answer due 8/3/2023. (Chapin, Aaron)
August 23, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BMO Harris Bank N.A. as to Renald Exama on 8/2/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. (Chapin, Aaron)
August 23, 2023 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Jonathan Golding regarding complaint, #1 , summons issued Declaration of Service by Mail (Golding, Jonathan)
July 13, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 09/01/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 08/24/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, )
July 11, 2023 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Renald Exama, Trexam Transport LLC (smb, )
July 11, 2023 CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, )
July 11, 2023 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, )
July 10, 2023 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by BMO Harris Bank N.A. (Chapin, Aaron)
July 10, 2023 Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by BMO Harris Bank N.A. (Chapin, Aaron)
July 10, 2023 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. by Aaron B. Chapin (Chapin, Aaron)
July 10, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by BMO Harris Bank N.A.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20814782. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Continuing Guaranty executed by Grantor dated December 14, 2022, evidencing the Guaranty, #3 Exhibit C - Plaintiff's Notice of Default and Acceleration to Borrower, and Notice of Default Respecting Guaranty to Guarantor, each dated June 2, 2023, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chapin, Aaron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Trexam Transport LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Represented By: Aaron B. Chapin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trexam Transport LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Renald Exama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?