Thomas v. Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC et al
| Eddie Thomas |
| Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC, Launch Servicing, LLC., Equifax Information Services L.L.C., Experian Information Solutions Inc. and TransUnion Teledata L.L.C. |
| 1:2023cv04515 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the notice of settlement. (Dckt. No. #14 ) Plaintiff has reached a settlement in principle with TransUnion (only). The parties must promptly file a stipulation of dismissal when the time comes. Mailed notice (jjr, ) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The three motions for an extension of time (Dckt. Nos. #6 , #10 , #13 ) are hereby granted. The responses to the complaint are due by September 27, 2023. That deadline applies to all defendants. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Launch Servicing, LLC. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Schultz, James) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Launch Servicing, LLC. by James Kevin Schultz (Schultz, James) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Settlement as to TransUnion by Eddie Thomas (Camarena, Paul) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC for extension of time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (UNOPPOSED) (Morrissey, James) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC by James Joseph Morrissey (Morrissey, James) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services L.L.C. by Kevin M. Hogan (Hogan, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Equifax Information Services L.L.C. (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Equifax Information Services L.L.C. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed (Lewis, Rodney) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Equifax Information Services L.L.C. by Rodney L. Lewis (Lewis, Rodney) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC, Launch Servicing, LLC., Equifax Information Services L.L.C., Experian Information Solutions Inc., TransUnion Teledata L.L.C. (smb, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 3, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Camarena, Paul) |
Filing 2
ORDER: #Local Rule 3.1# requires at the time of filing a case, plaintiff's counsel, or if the case is filed pro se, the plaintiff shall file with the original papers a completed designation sheet (civil cover sheet). No civil cover sheet was submitted at the time of filing this matter. Eddie Thomas is directed to file the #Civil Cover Sheet# within 14 days of this notification. Signed by the Executive Committee. (sxh, )
|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (sxh, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (sxh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Eddie Thomas; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20824224.(Camarena, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
