Moore v Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC
| Innazia Moore |
| Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC |
| 1:2023cv04659 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Steven C Seeger |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The motion for leave to appear pro hac vice (Dckt. No. #6 ) is granted. Attorney Ollie A Cleveland, III is added as counsel for Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on defendant's motion to dismiss (Dckt. No. #8 ). Plaintiff's response is due by September 28, 2023. Defendant's reply is due by October 12, 2023. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC (Morrison, David)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC by David E. Morrison (Morrison, David)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20974173. (Cleveland, Ollie)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Innazia Moore as to Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC on 8/8/2023, answer due 8/29/2023. (Coleman, Stefan)
|
|
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC. (jk2, )
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 3, 2023. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice. (jjr, )
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET for Plaintiff Innazia Moore by Juneitha S. Shambee (Shambee, Juneitha) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 7/20/2023 (jk2, ).
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Innazia Moore (Shambee, Juneitha) (Docket Text Modified by Clerk's Office) Modified on 7/20/2023 (jk2, ).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT paid 402$ Receipt number 4220736 filed by Innazia Moore; Jury Demand. (Shambee, Juneitha)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (evw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Innazia Moore | |
| Represented By: | Juneitha S. Shambee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Triumph Csr Acquisition, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ollie A Cleveland, III |
| Represented By: | David E. Morrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
