US Foods, Inc. v. Boston Market Corporation et al
US Foods, Inc. |
Boston Market Corporation, Engage Brands, LLC and Jignesh N Pandya, IV |
1:2023cv04790 |
July 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Manish S Shah |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's motion for leave to effect alternative service #10 is withdrawn, and no appearance is necessary. Defendants' response to the complaint is due 10/9/23. The parties' joint initial status report is now due 10/16/23. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 13 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion by US Foods, Inc. (Doyle, David) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION as to responsive pleading deadline (Doyle, David) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by David James Doyle for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief #10 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/21/2023 at 09:45 AM. (Doyle, David) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff US Foods, Inc.for Leave to Effect Alternative Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Non-Service, #2 Exhibit Correspondence)(Doyle, David) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Foods, Inc. as to Boston Market Corporation on 7/27/2023, answer due 8/17/2023. (Doyle, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Foods, Inc. as to Engage Brands, LLC on 7/27/2023, answer due 8/17/2023. (Doyle, David) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: By 9/25/23, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Boston Market Corporation, Engage Brands, LLC, Jignesh N Pandya, IV (evw, ) |
Filing 6 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by US Foods, Inc. (Doyle, David) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff US Foods, Inc. by Shelly A DeRousse (DeRousse, Shelly) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff US Foods, Inc. by Elizabeth L. Janczak (Janczak, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff US Foods, Inc. by David James Doyle (Doyle, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Doyle, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by US Foods, Inc.; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20859346. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Doyle, David) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (evw, ) |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (evw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.