Brown et al v. CCC One Intelligent Solutions et al
| Ronald A. Brown and Tonya L Brown |
| CCC One Intelligent Solutions, USAA, Safe Auto and MAACO |
| 1:2023cv04848 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: On July 28, 2023, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs' complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Court allowed Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint August 18, 2023. Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint to date. Therefore, the Court terminates this action. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiffs bring this suit alleging claims in violation of the "FTC Fraud & Scam Reduction Act and other laws of the Constitution" and request to proceed in forma pauperis and for attorney representation. This Court must screen all complaints accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss a complaint that is "frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief." 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); see also Hutchinson v. Spink, 126 F.3d 895, 899 (7th Cir. 1997) (recognizing the applicability of 1915 to cases brought by non-prisoners). Plaintiffs' complaint fails to state a claim. The Fraud and Scam Reduction Act, 15 U.S.C. 58, does not create a private right of action. And Plaintiffs' allegation that Defendant violated "other laws of the Constitution" does not provide Defendants with adequate notice of the nature of Plaintiffs' claims against them and their entitlement to relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Therefore, Plaintiffs' complaint #1 is dismissed without prejudice, and Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint by or before August 18, 2023. Plaintiffs' requests to proceed in informa pauperis and for attorney representation #4 are denied as moot. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lw, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiffs Ronald A. Brown, Tonya L Brown for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (lw, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiffs Ronald A. Brown & Tonya L Brown. (lw, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (lw, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Ronald A. Brown, Tonya L Brown. (lw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
