Teamsters Local 786 v. Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc.
| Teamsters Local 786 |
| Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv05054 |
| August 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jorge L Alonso |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss #6 Plaintiff's Complaint (Jones, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Defendant Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Jones, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. by Scott Mainquist (Mainquist, Scott) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. by Jennifer Lynn Jones (Jones, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Teamsters Local 786. Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. waiver sent on 8/3/2023, answer due 10/2/2023. (Persoon, Michael) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Teamsters Local 786 by Michael Paul Persoon (Persoon, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gmm) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gmm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Teamsters Local 786; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20887687. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. NIRMMA Decision, #2 Exhibit B. 7-13-23 Letter, #3 Exhibit C. Agreement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Persoon, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Teamsters Local 786 v. Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teamsters Local 786 | |
| Represented By: | Michael Paul Persoon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ozinga Chicago Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Scott Mainquist |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Lynn Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
