SEMANS v. THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
| DAVID SEMANS |
| THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION and Allstate Corporation, The |
| 1:2023cv05084 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Defendants' second unopposed motion for extension of time #13 is granted. Defendant shall answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's complaint by 10/25/2023. Mailed notice. (kp, ) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Defendant Allstate Corporation, The for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or Otherwise Plead (Second Unopposed) (Wieber, Sean) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Defendant's unopposed motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead #10 is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint by 9/25/23. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Allstate Corporation, The by Amelia Rose Garza-Mattia (Garza-Mattia, Amelia) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Allstate Corporation, The for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 or Otherwise Plead (Wieber, Sean) |
| Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Allstate Corporation, The (Wieber, Sean) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Allstate Corporation, The by Sean Gerald Wieber (Wieber, Sean) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DAVID SEMANS as to THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION on 8/4/2023, answer due 8/25/2023. (Bormes, James) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DAVID SEMANS by Christopher Elisha Roberts (Roberts, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DAVID SEMANS by Jacob U Ginsburg (Ginsburg, Jacob) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: By 10/12/2023, the parties are to file a joint status report. The parties may refer to the format detailed on the Court's website under New and Reassigned cases. Mailed notice. (ecw, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DAVID SEMANS by Catherine P. Sons (Sons, Catherine) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff DAVID SEMANS by James X. Bormes (Bormes, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by DAVID SEMANS; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20890667. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bormes, James) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION (smb, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcm) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jcm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
