Floyd v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
Lynda Floyd |
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Strength of Nature, LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, Namaste Laboratories LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and Revlon, Inc. |
1:2023cv05303 |
August 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:23-cv-05303 Floyd v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al / Direct file in ILND). IN RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060). (jj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Lynda Floyd by Michael Brandon Smith (Smith, Michael) (Linked document has the incorrect case number). Modified on 8/11/2023. (jj, ). |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lynda Floyd; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20915290.(Smith, Michael) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (mek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.