Barker v. J.P. Morgan ChaseBank
| Sandra Key Barker and Sandra Kay Barker |
| J.P. Morgan ChaseBank |
| 1:2023cv05390 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 9/18/2023. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: No jurisdictional statement was filed by the September 15, 2023 deadline, which the Court set by order dated August 15, 2023 #8 . It appearing the Court does not have jurisdiction, this matter is dismissed without prejudice. Enter judgment. Civil case closed. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: On review of the complaint, R. 1, the Court issues this subject matter jurisdiction inquiry. The complaint states that Plaintiff has (or had) three bank accounts with JP Morgan Chase and that the bank is in "violation of insurance FDIC" due to compromised savings account and 2 checking accounts." The complaint states that police reports were made, and claims were made to the Bank, and that the Bank committed a breach of contract. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. On the Court's review, there is no apparent basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction because no federal law claim is asserted, nor is there any indication that there is diversity among the parties even if Plaintiff seeks to bring a breach of contract claim. Nor does the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit that applies to banks give this Court jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claim. The Plaintiff must submit a Jurisdictional Statement explaining the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction by September 15, 2023, or else the case will be dismissed without prejudice. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied without prejudice to refiling. The Court has compared the application Plaintiff filed in this case on August 11, 2023 #4 to the application she filed in Case No. 23-cv-1218 on March 16, 2023 [23-cv-1218 DE 12.] The application filed in March 2023 states that Plaintiff's last date of employment was April 2020 and that the last monthly take-home pay was $940 per month. The application filed in the case before this Court on August 11, 2023 states that the date of Plaintiff's last employment was September 2017 and that the monthly take home pay was $280 per month. #4 . Plaintiff also lists an amount of unemployment/public assistance/welfare that is $100 more than the amount she listed in March 2023. The Court also notes that the Complaint #1 describes three bank accounts Plaintiff has (or had) at JP Morgan Bank, but none of those accounts are listed in the application. It is certainly possible that some of the information provided in the applications may have changed between March and August 2023, but Plaintiff has represented to this Court that her date of last employment is nearly two and a half years earlier than the date she represented to Judge Valderrama in Case No. 23-cv-1218. Plaintiff is reminded that all filings, including applications to proceed in forma pauperis, most be truthful and accurate and that the documents are signed under penalty of perjury. The application states "I declare under penalty of perjury that all of the information listed above is true and correct. I understand that a false statement may result in dismissal of my claims or other sanctions." Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (rp, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (rp, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Sandra Key Barker for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits) (rp, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Sandra Key Barker (rp, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (rp, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Sandra Key Barker (rp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
