Hairston v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
Iris Hairston |
Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, Avlon Industries, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham, LLC, L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC, MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Strength of Nature, LLC and Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. |
1:2023cv05410 |
August 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Mary M Rowland |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (mek) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Iris Hairston by Michael Brandon Smith (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Iris Hairston; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20923609.(Smith, Michael) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; (1:23-cv-05410 Hairston v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (aee, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.