Sandoval v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
| Alejandro Sandoval |
| Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv05448 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Alejandro Sandoval. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. waiver sent on 8/29/2023, answer due 10/30/2023. (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Waiver of Service sent to Ashley L. Orler - Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on 8/29/2023 by Plaintiff Alejandro Sandoval. (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling Conference is set for 11/20/2023 at 9:45 a.m. (to track the case only; no appearance is required). The joint Rule 26(f) planning report is due 11/13/2023. (The form of the report can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.) The court will enter a schedule based on the report. Mailed notice. (pmh) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (jxm, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Alejandro Sandoval by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Alejandro Sandoval by Alexander James Taylor (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alejandro Sandoval; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20924877. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Taylor, Alexander) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gmm) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sandoval v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alejandro Sandoval | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Alexander James Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
