Tinerella v. Capri of Downers Grove et al
| Emma Tinerella |
| Capri of Downers Grove and Brian Green |
| 1:2023cv05517 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Lindsay C Jenkins |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STATUS Report on Service by Emma Tinerella (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The docket reflects that a summons was issued by has not yet been returned as executed. Since no appearance has been filed on behalf of any Defendants, the October 31, 2023 #4 status hearing date is stricken and will be reset. Plaintiff should file a status report as to the progress of service of process by October 13, 2023. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: An in-person initial status hearing is set for October 31, 2023 at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 2119. The parties are directed to file a joint Initial Status Report by October 24, 2023. The report should comply with the requirements set forth in the Initial Status Report standing order, which can be found at Judge Jenkins's web page @ http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties must follow all the standing orders for Judge Jenkins and all Local Rules, which can be found at the same web page. At the Initial Status hearing, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; and (3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Emma Tinerella by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Emma Tinerella by Chad William Eisenback (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Emma Tinerella; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20930209. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Eisenback, Chad) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (gmm, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (gmm, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Capri of Downers Grove, Brian Green (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
