Tolbert v. City of Chicago et al
| Jacob Tolbert |
| City of Chicago, Thomas M Hanrahan and Matthew Bouch |
| 1:2023cv05626 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The in-person status hearing set for 10/18/2023 is stricken and reset to 10/31/2023 at 9:45 AM. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 9 STATUS Report Plaintiff by Jacob Tolbert (Browne, Garrett) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacob Tolbert as to Thomas M Hanrahan on 10/2/2023, answer due 10/23/2023. (Browne, Garrett) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacob Tolbert as to Matthew Bouch on 10/2/2023, answer due 10/23/2023. (Browne, Garrett) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jacob Tolbert as to City of Chicago on 10/5/2023, answer due 10/26/2023. (Browne, Garrett) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Matthew Bouch, City of Chicago, Thomas M Hanrahan (gmm, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Status hearing is set for 10/18/2023 at 10:45 AM as an in-person hearing. Plaintiff(s) is directed to advise the defendant(s) of the status hearing forthwith. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. If the parties agree to consent jurisdiction before the Magistrate Judge, all parties must sign the consent form and electronically file the signed form on the case docket. The court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jacob Tolbert by Edward M. Fox (Fox, Edward) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jacob Tolbert by Garrett W. Browne (Browne, Garrett) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Browne, Garrett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jacob Tolbert; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20941286.(Browne, Garrett) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jxm, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jxm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
