Adams v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
| Wanda Adams |
| Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., HOUSE OF CHEATHAM, LLC, Luster Products, Inc., MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., Namaste Laboratories LLC, Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and Strength of Nature, LLC |
| 1:2023cv05968 |
| August 23, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Mary M Rowland |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wanda Adams by Timothy J. Becker (Becker, Timothy) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (jxm, ) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED from Northern District of Illinois; ( 1:23-cv-05968 Adams v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al / Direct file in ILND). In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (MDL 3060 ) (rp, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Becker, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Wanda Adams; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20963548.(Becker, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
